🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding System & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.